|
Post by hunt5454 on Jul 15, 2019 23:45:14 GMT
7 rounds remaining, 29 picks each (6 already done) = 197 picks remaining. If we give each pick an hour which is a lot and not couting for picks that won't take an hour it would take slighlty over 8 days to end the draft. But with some people submitting lists, Bucks being auto and some people not taking a full hour to pick it can easily be done in under 7 days I know im just giving you some crap way to walk the less intelligent people in here through it tho
|
|
|
Post by ealvarez45 on Jul 15, 2019 23:45:47 GMT
Basically yes, that's exactly what I want to be done. Thank You JGB. I think the actual RFA way favors really good players way too much. The whole point of this rule is to allow someone to find a gem in pick 18 and give them the security year 5 that someone isnt going to come in and steal them. I’m mean we added the RFA to give teams the security, if we just want to play Yatzy then I say scrap the rule because at that point I’m sending out 28 different messages for a dice roll on max players Nah, you'd only need to do this rarely. You won't have to do it for Kobe and shit; I don't think anyone in here is brain dead. I'd be shocked if you'd ever need to do this for more than 5 players each FA. This would be for the Vinny Del Negros and Josh McRoberts of the world. Make the GM of the player request this to be done. When inputting FA offers you jot down the best 2-3 best ones or something and show them to the home owner.
|
|
|
Post by jse11 on Jul 15, 2019 23:47:11 GMT
I’m mean we added the RFA to give teams the security, if we just want to play Yatzy then I say scrap the rule because at that point I’m sending out 28 different messages for a dice roll on max players Nah, you'd only need to do this rarely. You won't have to do it for Kobe and shit; I don't think anyone in here is brain dead. I'd be shocked if you'd ever need to do this for more than 5 players each FA. This would be for the Vinny Del Negros and Josh McRoberts of the world. Make the GM of the player request this to be done. When inputting FA offers you jot down the best 2-3 best ones or something and show them to the home owner. you missed the whole purpose of that. You want a dice roll, we want security
|
|
|
Post by ealvarez45 on Jul 15, 2019 23:51:42 GMT
Nah, you'd only need to do this rarely. You won't have to do it for Kobe and shit; I don't think anyone in here is brain dead. I'd be shocked if you'd ever need to do this for more than 5 players each FA. This would be for the Vinny Del Negros and Josh McRoberts of the world. Make the GM of the player request this to be done. When inputting FA offers you jot down the best 2-3 best ones or something and show them to the home owner. you missed the whole purpose of that. You want a dice roll, we want security Guaranteed security is the whole reason I'm against it, and favors people who tank in the draft. Besides the whole cap kill thing in FA day 1. The whole point of an "RFA" is that it promotes camping up mediocre players. You want to know what other people are offering then you should know if you made them your project. You as the home team have the chance to offer them better, so do it. Not down for 100% 10 year guarantee on a beast, that's wack.
|
|
cop5414
Starter
I have made 570 posts
Location:
|
Post by cop5414 on Jul 15, 2019 23:52:03 GMT
Nah, you'd only need to do this rarely. You won't have to do it for Kobe and shit; I don't think anyone in here is brain dead. I'd be shocked if you'd ever need to do this for more than 5 players each FA. This would be for the Vinny Del Negros and Josh McRoberts of the world. Make the GM of the player request this to be done. When inputting FA offers you jot down the best 2-3 best ones or something and show them to the home owner. you missed the whole purpose of that. You want a dice roll, we want security When did the conversation switch to talking about the border crisis?
|
|
|
Post by ealvarez45 on Jul 15, 2019 23:53:37 GMT
you missed the whole purpose of that. You want a dice roll, we want security Guaranteed security is the whole reason I'm against it, and favors people who tank in the draft. Besides the whole cap kill thing in FA day 1. The whole point of an "RFA" is that it promotes camping up mediocre players. You want to know what other people are offering then you should know if you made them your project. You as the home team have the chance to offer them better, so do it. Not down for 100% 10 year guarantee on a beast, that's wack. And you'd keep the beast at a minimum, wouldn't have to mega max him. If Kobe offers to resign for the mega max why would I accept? Let some asshole "steal" him from me and then I'll just take them from that team for 5 years 10% increases The killing of cap on a sim day is also not to be underestimated. That shit would be annoying
|
|
|
Post by jse11 on Jul 15, 2019 23:55:31 GMT
you missed the whole purpose of that. You want a dice roll, we want security Guaranteed security is the whole reason I'm against it, and favors people who tank in the draft. Besides the whole cap kill thing in FA day 1. The whole point of an "RFA" is that it promotes camping up mediocre players. You want to know what other people are offering then you should know if you made them your project. You as the home team have the chance to offer them better, so do it. Not down for 100% 10 year guarantee on a beast, that's wack. I can extend FA a day since that is your idea anyways, have an RFA day we’re I input all offers and run the sim, I will screen shot results and post the RFA that signed on what would be day one of the simulation. This gives the RFA owner the day to match or repeal. If he matches this opens back up the cap for for what would be day one. If he lets him walk then that player absorbs the cap
|
|
|
Post by jse11 on Jul 15, 2019 23:56:21 GMT
Guaranteed security is the whole reason I'm against it, and favors people who tank in the draft. Besides the whole cap kill thing in FA day 1. The whole point of an "RFA" is that it promotes camping up mediocre players. You want to know what other people are offering then you should know if you made them your project. You as the home team have the chance to offer them better, so do it. Not down for 100% 10 year guarantee on a beast, that's wack. And you'd keep the beast at a minimum, wouldn't have to mega max him. If Kobe offers to resign for the mega max why would I accept? Let some asshole "steal" him from me and then I'll just take them from that team for 5 years 10% increases The killing of cap on a sim day is also not to be underestimated. That shit would be annoying why would an ass hat offer Kobe a contract? Like you just said
|
|
|
Post by ealvarez45 on Jul 15, 2019 23:59:05 GMT
And you'd keep the beast at a minimum, wouldn't have to mega max him. If Kobe offers to resign for the mega max why would I accept? Let some asshole "steal" him from me and then I'll just take them from that team for 5 years 10% increases The killing of cap on a sim day is also not to be underestimated. That shit would be annoying why would an ass hat offer Kobe a contract? Like you just said Somebody would have to bite the bullet for the rest of us.
|
|
jgb34
Starter
I have made 652 posts
Location:
|
Post by jgb34 on Jul 16, 2019 0:00:22 GMT
Basically yes, that's exactly what I want to be done. Thank You JGB. I think the actual RFA way favors really good players way too much. The whole point of this rule is to allow someone to find a gem in pick 18 and give them the security year 5 that someone isnt going to come in and steal them. I’m mean we added the RFA to give teams the security, if we just want to play Yatzy then I say scrap the rule because at that point I’m sending out 28 different messages for a dice roll on max players I have a feeling the rule will rarely come into play. Only EA is spending $5K on McRoberts. It’ll happen with the Lebron and Jordan’s but even then it can be hard to afford if you’re going for it.
|
|
|
Post by ealvarez45 on Jul 16, 2019 0:02:19 GMT
Guaranteed security is the whole reason I'm against it, and favors people who tank in the draft. Besides the whole cap kill thing in FA day 1. The whole point of an "RFA" is that it promotes camping up mediocre players. You want to know what other people are offering then you should know if you made them your project. You as the home team have the chance to offer them better, so do it. Not down for 100% 10 year guarantee on a beast, that's wack. I can extend FA a day since that is your idea anyways, have an RFA day we’re I input all offers and run the sim, I will screen shot results and post the RFA that signed on what would be day one of the simulation. This gives the RFA owner the day to match or repeal. If he matches this opens back up the cap for for what would be day one. If he lets him walk then that player absorbs the cap This would kill the cap problem, and it wouldn't allow home teams to have soft cap to play with when trying to re-sign someone. Still not sure if the 10 year safety net is something you'd want to have, especially at a discount.
|
|
|
Post by ealvarez45 on Jul 16, 2019 0:03:36 GMT
Is this rule to let someone keep Magic Johnson guaranteed for 10 years or is this rule to protect the investment made by GM's on project players?
|
|
|
Post by jse11 on Jul 16, 2019 0:05:38 GMT
I can extend FA a day since that is your idea anyways, have an RFA day we’re I input all offers and run the sim, I will screen shot results and post the RFA that signed on what would be day one of the simulation. This gives the RFA owner the day to match or repeal. If he matches this opens back up the cap for for what would be day one. If he lets him walk then that player absorbs the cap This would kill the cap problem, and it wouldn't allow home teams to have soft cap to play with when trying to re-sign someone. Still not sure if the 10 year safety net is something you'd want to have, especially at a discount. I agreed that ten was too long, that’s why I think in the rules it says 9...I thought 10 was too long and we took a year off. Also who many nba superstars leave their team before they get off their RFA contract/ rookie extension?
|
|
cop5414
Starter
I have made 570 posts
Location:
|
Post by cop5414 on Jul 16, 2019 0:06:47 GMT
Basically yes, that's exactly what I want to be done. Thank You JGB. I think the actual RFA way favors really good players way too much. The whole point of this rule is to allow someone to find a gem in pick 18 and give them the security year 5 that someone isnt going to come in and steal them. you could also add some sort of cash penalty for signing your player as a rfa based off where they were picked or some other metric just to level it out some more Hey let's discuss this idea of getting some sort of compensation when another team signs your RFA.
|
|
|
Post by jse11 on Jul 16, 2019 0:09:20 GMT
you could also add some sort of cash penalty for signing your player as a rfa based off where they were picked or some other metric just to level it out some more Hey let's discuss this idea of getting some sort of compensation when another team signs your RFA. I tried to call spencer to discuss this...my opinion was that the team stealing the player gives up a first rounder
|
|